Biography of Dorothy Parker, American Poet and Humorist

Dorothy Parker (born Dorothy Rothschild; August 22, 1893 – June 7, 1967) was an American poet and satirist. Despite a roller coaster of a career that included a stint on a Hollywood blacklist, Parker produced a large volume of witty, successful work that has endured. Fast Facts: Dorothy Parker Known For: American humorist, poet, and civil activistBorn:  August 22, 1893 in Long Branch, New JerseyParents:  Jacob Henry Rothschild and Eliza Annie RothschildDied:  June 7, 1967 in New York CityEducation: Convent of the Blessed Sacrament; Miss Danas School (until age 18)Selected Works:  Enough Rope (1926), Sunset Gun  (1928),  Death and Taxes  (1931), After Such Pleasures  (1933),  Not So Deep as a Well  (1936)Spouses:  Edwin Pond Parker II (m. 1917-1928); Alan Campbell (m. 1934-1947; 1950-1963)Notable Quote: â€Å"Theres a hell of a distance between wise-cracking and wit. Wit has truth in it; wise-cracking is simply calisthenics with words. Early Life Dorothy Parker was born to Jacob Henry Rothschild and his wife Eliza (nà ©e Marston) in Long Beach, New Jersey, where her parents had a summer beach cottage. Her father was descended from German Jewish merchants whose family had settled in Alabama half a century earlier, and her mother had Scottish heritage. One of her father’s siblings, his youngest brother Martin, died in the sinking of the Titanic when Parker was 19 years old. Shortly after her birth, the Rothschild family returned to the Upper West Side in Manhattan. Her mother died in 1898, just weeks before Parker’s fifth birthday. Two years later, Jacob Rothschild married Eleanor Frances Lewis. By some accounts, Parker despised both her father and her stepmother, accusing her father of abuse and refusing to address her stepmother as anything other than â€Å"the housekeeper.† However, other accounts dispute this characterization of her childhood and suggest instead that she actually had a warm, affectionate family life. She and her sister Helen attended a Catholic school, although their upbringing was not Catholic, and their stepmother Eleanor died only a few years later, when Parker was 9 years old. Parker eventually attended Miss Danas School, a finishing school in Morristown, New Jersey, but accounts differ as to whether or not she actually graduated from the school. When Parker was 20, her father died, leaving her to support herself. She met her living expenses by working as a pianist at a dance school. At the same time, she worked on writing poetry in her spare time. In 1917, Parker met Edwin Pond Parker II, a stockbroker on Wall Street who, like her, was 24 years old. They were married fairly quickly, before Edwin left to serve in the army during World War I. He returned from the war, and the couple were married for 11 years before she filed for divorce in 1928. Dorothy Parker went on to marry screenwriter and actor Alan Campbell in 1934, but kept her first married name. She and Campbell divorced in 1947 but remarried in 1950; although they had other brief separations, they remained married until his death. Magazine Writer (1914-1925) Parkers work appeared in the following publications:Vanity FairAinslees MagazineLadies Home JournalLIFESaturday Evening PostThe New Yorker Parker’s first publication came in 1914, when she sold her first poem to Vanity Fair magazine. This publication put her on the radar of the Condà © Nast magazine company, and she was soon hired as an editorial assistant at Vogue. She remained there for about two years before moving over to Vanity Fair, where she had her first full-time writing job as a staff writer. In 1918, Parker’s writing truly took off when she became the temporary theater critic for Vanity Fair, filling in while her colleague P.G. Wodehouse was on vacation. Her particular brand of biting wit made her a hit with readers, but offended powerful producers, so her tenure only lasted until 1920. However, during her time at Vanity Fair, she met several fellow writers, including humorist Robert Benchley and Robert E. Sherwood. The three of them began a tradition of lunches at the Algonquin Hotel, founding what came to be called the Algonquin Round Table, a circle of New York writers who met almost daily for lunches where they exchanged witty comments and playful debates. Since many of the writers in the group had their own newspaper columns, the witty remarks were often transcribed and shared with the public, helping garner Parker and her colleagues a reputation for sharp wit and clever wordplay. Members of the Algonquin Round Table, including Parker (bottom right), in 1938.   Bettmann / Getty Images Parker was dismissed from Vanity Fair for her controversial criticisms in 1920 (and her friends Benchley and Sherwood then resigned from the magazine in solidarity and in protest), but that wasn’t even close to the end of her magazine writing career. In fact, she continued to publish pieces in Vanity Fair, just not as a staff writer. She worked for Ainslee’s Magazine and also published pieces in popular magazines such as Ladies’ Home Journal, Life, and the Saturday Evening Post. In 1925, Harold Ross founded The New Yorker and invited Parker (and Benchley) to join the editorial board. She began writing content for the magazine in its second issue, and she soon became noted for her short, sharp-tongued poems. Parker largely mined her own life for darkly humorous content, frequently writing about her failed romances and even describing thoughts of suicide. Over the course of the 1920s, she published over 300 poems among many magazines. Poet and Playwright (1925 – 1932) Enough Rope (1926)Sunset Gun (1928)Close Harmony (1929)Laments for the Living (1930)Death and Taxes (1931) Parker turned her attention to the theater briefly in 1924, collaborating with playwright Elmer Rice to write Close Harmony. Despite positive reviews, it closed after only running 24 performances on Broadway, but it did enjoy a successful second life as a touring production renamed The Lady Next Door. Parker published her first full volume of poetry, titled Enough Rope, in 1926. It sold around 47,000 copies and was well-reviewed by most critics, although some dismissed it as being shallow â€Å"flapper† poetry. Over the next few years, she released several more collections of short work, including both poetry and short stories. Her poetry collections were Sunset Gun  (1928) and  Death and Taxes  (1931), interspersed with her short story collections  Laments for the Living  (1930) and  After Such Pleasures  (1933). During this time, she also wrote regular material for The New Yorker under the byline â€Å"Constant Reader.† Her most well-known short story, Big Blonde, was published in The Bookman magazine and was awarded the O. Henry Award for the best short story of 1929. Portrait of Dorothy Parker, circa 1920.   Bettmann / Getty Images Although her writing career was stronger than ever, Parker’s personal life was somewhat less successful (which, of course, only provided more fodder for her material–Parker didn’t shy away from poking fun at herself). She divorced her husband in 1928 and subsequently embarked on several romances, including ones with publisher Seward Collins and reporter and playwright Charles MacArthur. Her relationship with MacArthur resulted in a pregnancy, which she terminated. Although she wrote about this period with her trademark biting humor, she also privately struggled with depression and even attempted suicide at one point. Parker’s interest in social and political activism began in earnest during the late 1920s. She was arrested on loitering charges in Boston when she traveled there to protest the controversial death sentences of Sacco and Vanzetti, Italian anarchists who had been convicted of murder despite the evidence against them falling apart; their conviction was largely suspected to be the result of anti-Italian and anti-immigrant sentiments. Writer in Hollywood and Beyond (1932-1963) After Such Pleasures  (1933)Suzy (1936)A Star Is Born (1937)Sweethearts (1938)Trade Winds (1938)Saboteur (1942)Here Lies: The Collected Stories of Dorothy Parker  (1939)Collected Stories (1942)The Portable Dorothy Parker (1944)Smash-Up, the Story of a Woman (1947)The Fan (1949) In 1932, Parker met Alan Campbell, an actor/screenwriter and former Army intelligence officer, and they married in 1934. They moved together to Hollywood, where they signed contracts with Paramount Pictures and eventually began doing freelance work for multiple studios. Within the first five years of her Hollywood career, she received her first Oscar nomination: she, Campbell, and Robert Carson wrote the script for the 1937 film A Star Is Born and were nominated for best original screenplay. She later received another nomination in 1947 for co-writing Smash-Up, the Story of a Woman. Dorothy Parker and husband Alan Campbell, circa 1937. Evening Standard / Getty Images   During the Great Depression, Parker was among many artists and intellectuals who became more vocal in social and civil rights issues and more critical of government authority figures. Although she may not have been a card-carrying communist herself, she certainly sympathized with some of their causes; during the Spanish Civil War, she reported on the Republican (left-leaning, also known as Loyalist) cause for the communist magazine The New Masses. She also helped found the Hollywood Anti-Nazi League (with the support of European communists), which the FBI suspected was a communist front. It’s unclear how many of the group’s members realized that a good portion of their donations were funding Communist Party activities. In the early 1940s, Parker’s work was selected to be part of an anthology series compiled for servicemen stationed overseas. The book included more than 20 of Parker’s short stories, as well as several poems, and it was eventually published in the U.S. under the title The Portable Dorothy Parker. Among all of the â€Å"Portable† sets from Viking Press, only Parker’s, Shakespeare’s, and the volume dedicated to the Bible have never been out of print. Parker’s personal relationships continued to be fraught, both in her platonic relationships and in her marriage. As she turned her attention more and more to left-wing political causes (such as supporting Loyalist refugees from Spain, where the far-right Nationalists emerged victorious), she became more distant from her old friends. Her marriage also hit the rocks, with her drinking and Campbell’s affair leading to a divorce in 1947. They then remarried in 1950, then separated again in 1952. Parker moved back to New York, remaining there until 1961, when she and Campbell reconciled and she returned to Hollywood to work with him on several projects, all of which went unproduced. Because of her involvement with the Communist Party, Parker’s career prospects became more precarious. She was named in an anti-Communist publication in 1950 and was the subject of a large FBI dossier during the McCarthy era. As a result, Parker was placed on the Hollywood blacklist and saw her screenwriting career come to an abrupt end. Her last screenwriting credit was The Fan, a 1949 adaptation of the Oscar Wilde play Lady Windemere’s Fan. She fared somewhat better after returning to New York, writing book reviews for Esquire. Literary Styles and Themes Parker’s themes and style of writing evolved considerably over time. In her early career, her focus was very much on pithy, witty poems and short stories, often dealing with darkly humorous, bittersweet subjects such as the disillusionment of the 1920s and her own personal life. Failed romances and suicidal ideation were among the running themes in Parker’s early work, appearing in many of her hundreds of poems and short works early in her writing career. During her Hollywood years, it’s difficult to pinpoint Parker’s specific voice at times, since she was never the sole screenwriter on any of her films. Elements of ambition and ill-fated romance show up frequently, as in A Star Is Born, The Fan, and Smash-Up, the Story of a Woman. Her specific voice can be heard in individual lines of dialogue, but due to the nature of her collaborations and of the Hollywood studio system at the time, it’s harder to discuss these films in the context of Parker’s overall literary output. As time went on, Parker began writing with more of a political slant. Her sharp-edged wit didn’t disappear, but it simply had new and different targets. Parker’s involvement with left-wing political causes and civil rights took precedence over her more â€Å"witty† works, and in later years, she came to resent her earlier reputation as a satirist and wise-cracking writer. Dorothy Parker in 1937.   Hansel Mieth / Getty Images Death After her husband’s death from a drug overdose in 1963, Parker returned once more to New York. She remained there for the next four years, working in radio as a writer for the show Columbia Workshop and occasionally appearing on the shows Information Please and Author, Author. In her later years, she spoke derisively about the Algonquin Round Table and its participants, comparing them unfavorably to the literary â€Å"greats† of the era. Parker suffered a fatal heart attack on June 7, 1967. Her will had left her estate to Martin Luther King, Jr., but he only outlived her for a year. Following his death, the King family bequeathed Parker’s estate to the NAACP, which, in 1988, claimed Parker’s ashes and created a memorial garden for her at their Baltimore headquarters. Legacy In many ways, Parker’s legacy is divided into two parts. On the one hand, her wit and humor has endured even in the decades after her death, making her an oft-quoted and well-remembered humorist and observer of humanity. On the other hand, her outspokenness in defense of civil liberties earned her plenty of enemies and damaged her career, but it is also a key part of her positive legacy in the modern day. Parker’s very presence is something of a 20th-century American touchstone. She’s been fictionalized numerous times in works by other writers—both in her own time and up through the modern day. Her influence is not, perhaps, as obvious as some of her contemporaries, but she’s unforgettable nonetheless. Sources Herrmann, Dorothy. With Malice Toward All: The Quips, Lives and Loves of Some Celebrated 20th-Century American Wits. New York: G. P. Putnams Sons, 1982.Kinney, Authur F. Dorothy Parker. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1978.Meade, Marion.  Dorothy Parker: What Fresh Hell Is This?. New York: Penguin Books, 1987.

The Focus Of This Essay Will Be An Argument By Peter Van

The focus of this essay will be an argument by Peter Van Inwagen known as the â€Å"Consequence Argument.† The argument’s main goal is to refute compatibilism, or the idea that free will and determinism are reconcilable. Van Inwagen’s argument can be expressed as follows: 1. Assume determinism, the idea that the laws of nature and the state of the past are consistent with exactly one future outcome, is true. 2. A person p has no choice about what happened in the past. 3. P also has no choice about what the laws of nature are. 4. From premises 2 and 3, it can be assumed that p has no choice about either what happened in the past or over what the laws of nature are. 5. Because determinism is true, it is a necessary truth that if 4 is true, then†¦show more content†¦Combining this with the fact that humans cannot change important constants and laws that govern the current state of the universe, the conclusion that must be reached, with determinism being true, is that there is only one path of action at any time that is available to an agent. If an agent cannot change the conditions around him or behind him so that he could choose another path, then, per the determinist, it is necessarily true that the agent could not have any power over their future actions. The compatibilist, on the other hand, would reject the argument. While the compatibilist would say that the first premise asserting the truth of determinism is true, they would likely attack the fifth and sixth premises. According to them, the fifth premise is assuming something that may not be necessarily true: because determinism is true, if someone does not have control over the l aws of nature or the past, then it is logically entailed (in other words, necessary with the given premises) that they have no control over their future actions. Because they would reject premise five, they would have to reject premise 6, as it follows from premise 5. The compatibilist’s rejection of premise five is rooted in his issue with how, in his view, Van Inwagen combines physical determinism and agent determinism, even though the two concepts are, in theShow MoreRelatedDoris Schroeder, human rights do not derive from human dignity. Schroeder states that human1600 Words   |  7 Pageshimself from all other beings in the world. He can measure himself with every other being of this kind and value himself on a footing equal to them. . . . Humanity in his person is the object of the respect which he can demand from every other human being.† Schroeder points out that according to Kant, humans have dignity because of their ability to reason with the moral and immoral (Shroeder, 2012). This would then exclude all irrational and immoral people. Schroeder concludes that â€Å"describingRead MoreHume s Theory Of Free Will And Moral Responsibility1940 Words   |  8 PagesBerkeley, which largely focussed on the belief that knowledge came from our sensory experiences; this essay will focus on Hume’s work regarding the concept of free will and moral responsibility. It will do this by introducing Hume’s compatibilism and his term ‘the liberty of spontaneity’, in doing so this essay will also explain Hume’s argument against libertarianism. Next, this essay will evaluate Hume’s arguments to determine whether or not possessing the liberty of spontaneity leads to free will. InRead MoreModern Architecture Essays4700 Words   |  19 PagesESSAY 1 Le Corbusier and Mies van de Rohe were two architects influenced by the contemporary movements of their time period. Le Corbusier’s architectural ideology was derived from the multiple techniques and styles he had previously encountered through study. His early designs were expressive of the â€Å"youth style† which was introduced to him by his instructor, L’Eplattenier. New technologies, however, began to influence his philosophies. Le Corbusier saw potential in concrete building systemsRead More Dorothy L. Sayers’ Gaudy Night Essay5682 Words   |  23 Pages(108), she did not present a new argument, but continued the tradition that Gaudy Night does not center on the detective story.   Barbara Harrison even labeled Dorothy Sayers’s Lord Peter/Harriet Vane books, Strong Poison, Gaudy Night, and Busman’s Honeymoon, as â€Å"deliriously happy-ending romances† (66).   The label stretches the definition of a romance, but Gaudy Ni ght indeed has very little to do with crime.   Sayers encrypted the real story within her detective novel.   This story behind the story narratesRead MoreAnalysis: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization1950 Words   |  8 Pages3 Importance 3 Analysis 3 Assumptions 7 Recommendations 7 Closing 8 References 8 Abstract The essay is an analysis of Peter Senges The 5th Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. The essay answers the questions relating to the five disciplines that are mentioned in the book and the significance of a learning organization. Executive Summary Peter Senge has described learning organizations in his masterpiece The 5th Discipline: The Art and Practice of theRead More The Free Will Debate Essay2989 Words   |  12 Pagesfreedom of action and moral accountability, which is the main reason why the debate is so vital. Simply stated, a person who has free will refers to an individual’s ability to choose his or her route of action. However, animals also appear to suit this measure, further adding to the debate because free will is typically thought to only be possessed by human beings (Broad 1990). Over the years, there has been an extended running controversial debate as to whether free will truly needs an agentRead MoreCritically Examine the Arguments for and Against Deliberately Trying to Change Organizations3452 Words   |  14 PagesAssessed Essay OC4 â€Å"Critically examine the arguments for and against deliberately trying to change organizations† Introduction Before we begin to explore whether it is a worthwhile exercise to seek to change an organisation through a planned approach we must first begin with a definition of our terms. What might we mean by â€Å"deliberate†, â€Å"change† and an â€Å"organisation† To do so will help us explore under what circumstances planned change may be worthwhile or even possible. Huczynski BuchananRead MoreContemporary Moral Issue Essay2709 Words   |  11 Pagestheir attendant controversies, and as an introduction to moral philosophy, this course teaches us how respected thinkers have rigorously explored such topics as capital punishment, social inequality, and environmental responsibility. Simultaneously, this course equips us to formulate and argue our own positions on these topics, whether through writing, discussion, or debate. Required Texts: The required anthology for this course is the 4th edition of Emmett Barcalow’s Moral Philosophy: Theories andRead MoreEssay on Can Managers Influence Their Organisations Culture?2843 Words   |  12 PagesPop-management theorists have since made direct links between an organisation’s culture and its performance, though this is not the entire story. As Kilmann et al (1985) put it: ‘a culture has a positive impact on an organisation when it points behaviour in the right direction... alternatively, a culture has a negative impact when it points behaviour in the wrong direction’. This essay will serve to explain to what extent management is able to alter, maintain or build the culture of its organisationRead MoreCritically Evaluate the Argument That Performance Management Nourishes Short-Term Performance, Annihilates Long-Term Planning, Builds Fear, Demolishes Teamwork, Nourishes Rivalry and Organisational Politics.2464 Words   |  10 Pageso rganisations worst (Bacal 1994, Deming 1986). However, these arguments against performance management were made a long time ago, with some more than twenty years ago. With the advance in technology and globalisation, who is to say that performance management has not improved? In the later chapters, we will take a look at the evolution of performance management to find out its beginnings and influences from earlier management theories. Through this essay, we will discover that performance management today

Hullabaloo in the Guava Orchard by Kiran Desai free essay sample

Hullabaloo: great noise or excitement; uproar. †¢On the one hand, people acted in different ways: ?Ammaji tried to chase the monkeys, to find a solution. ?Kulfi wanted to cook the monkeys, which shows that people don’t like them and don’t consider them sacred any more ? The CMO was afraid of them and that’s why he avoided them ? Sampath was frustrated and he didn’t say good metaphors any more ? Devotes started to argue with each other because, some of them thought monkeys were a menace and they had to be removed from Shahkot, and others still considered them sacred no matter what they did †¢On the other hand the monkeys acted this way: ?They still were harassing people, and now they started using violence (biting people) because they were drunk 2)Analyze critically how the opening pages of the chapter suggest how belief always divide people (118-119) †¢People start arguing because they have different points of view concerning the monkey’s problem. We will write a custom essay sample on Hullabaloo in the Guava Orchard by Kiran Desai or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page One group said that monkeys were sacred and they didn? t want them to be expelled from Shahkot. †¢They formed a Monkey Protection Society. †¢Miss Jyotsna insulted the spy and she bit him for wanted to remove the monkeys The other group wanted monkeys to be out of their lives because they consider their behavior couldn’t be accepted and much less considered sacred †¢The spy was one of those people who wanted monkeys out of Shahkot 3)What is the effect of this Hullabaloo on Sampath, no referred as the â€Å"Monkey Baba† or â€Å"Hanuman†, as showed on p. 18 and how this end with peace in Shahkot at the end of the chapter. †¢These arguing affected Sampath’s mood, and happiness †¢He was confused and he wanted to be alone more than ever †¢He couldn’t perform good metaphors any more †¢At the end of the chapter, this problem was solved because people went back to the town and argued there †¢Sampath feels calm, and he enjoys the noise of nature